Contacts Calendar Search Sitemap
About CRC Reef Research Programs Postgrad Education & Training Publications Media Centre Our Members For CRC Reef Members

CRC REEF RESEARCH CENTRE TECHNICAL REPORT No. 40

The sustainability of Queensland's coral harvest fishery

Vicki Harriott, CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd

Executive Summary

This report was prepared in close consultation with coral biologists Drs Done and Veron from the Australian Institute of Marine Science and Dr Willis of James Cook University. Additional unpublished information about the fishery and its management was contributed by representatives from Queensland Fisheries Service, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, and three industry representatives.

Queensland's coral harvest fishery is small by international standards, and is regulated by both input and output controls. Only 25% of the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) of 200 tonnes is currently harvested, including approximately 25 tonnes of live coral and 25 tonnes of rubble and "living rock" (a reef substrate used in aquaria). Estimates of the total value of the fishery are between AUS $0.5 million and AUS $1 million per year.

Pocillopora
Pocillopora
Photo: Vicki Harriott

The nature of the fishery in Queensland has changed over the last two decades with 34 of 36 fishers currently reliant on the sale of live corals for aquaria. Data indicate that about 60% by weight of live corals and all the living rock and rubble component of the harvest are for the aquarium coral market. Two abundant coral taxa are primarily targeted for the ornamental coral trade, while the aquarium market targets small colonies of a wide variety of hard coral and soft coral species, as well as the living rock and rubble component of the harvest.

The small total harvest in the fishery for both live corals and living rock does not represent a risk to the integrity of the reef system on either a reef-wide or regional scale. The potential impacts of the coral harvest fishery are localised and are many orders of magnitude smaller than those resulting from impacts such as cyclones, coral bleaching and predation by the crown-of-thorns starfish.

Trachyphyllia
Trachyphyllia
Photo: Vicki Harriott

In recent years, some inshore and mid-shelf reefs of the Great Barrier Reef have been subjected to high levels of natural impact as a result of coral bleaching or crown-of-thorns starfish predation. Harvesting of corals on these reefs should be avoided to assist recovery of the coral communities.

An extensive study in 1985 evaluated the ecological sustainability of the ornamental coral fishery, and reported that it was sustainable because the target corals grew rapidly and recruited well, and the fishery was small and restricted to limited areas. The harvest of these species is currently lower than it was at the time of the study in 1985.

The species targeted by the aquarium coral industry are generally small colonies (<15cm diameter) of large-polyped species which survive well in aquaria. Many of the target species are locally abundant but patchily distributed. The favoured habitat type for most of these species is deep (10 - 25m) turbid water. Relatively little detailed information about distribution and life history is available for some of the target species.

The life history of most corals allows for broad dispersal of their reproductive products providing for replenishment of populations from nearby reef areas. Coral colonies also reproduce vegetatively, by budding or from the dispersal of fragments.

Where there is uncertainty about appropriate and sustainable harvest levels for particular species, an appropriate management regime should include:

  • species-level analysis of take to provide detailed Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) data;
  • protecting a significant percentage of reefs within a region from harvesting; and
  • collection of further information about distribution and ecology of harvest species.

The current industry is supportive of further research on coral fisheries' species and of more detailed and rigorous monitoring of catch.

The current management regime involves 50 small fixed leases (collection authorities) that contain few corals suitable for the aquarium trade. The fact that the current management regime is inappropriate for the fishery is recognised by both fishers and fisheries managers.

Ecological sustainability and minimisation of impacts on coral communities is favoured by spreading collection effort over wider areas, rather than by concentrating the same effort in small areas.

The Total Allowable Catch (TAC) should be reduced to more closely reflect the current much lower level of catch in the fishery, thus removing latent effort from the fishery. Separate catch quotas should be set for the living rock/rubble and live coral component of the fishery.

Roving licences, i.e. collection within the general use zones of the Marine Park, are favoured by the industry but are opposed by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) on the basis of the potential to increase conflicts between users, difficulty in assessing compliance, and increased difficulty in monitoring impacts.

Management of the fishery on a whole-reef basis with harvest permitted on a percentage of general use reefs is likely to be acceptable to both industry and management. It enhances ecological sustainability and reduces impacts on reefs by spreading effort over a wider area than allowed under the present management regime. It is consistent with the objectives of GBRMPA's Representative Areas Program that aims to zone reefs on a whole-reef basis. It provides for a large percentage of reefs to remain as replenishment areas, and allows compliance monitoring and monitoring of environmental impacts.

Management of real or perceived conflicts with other reef users is a significant issue for the fishery. Designation of collection areas must minimise the risk of conflict. Re-designation of most collection sites in deeper, turbid locations would benefit the industry and reduce conflicts with the tourism industry, which seldom uses such areas.

Farming of corals (collection and growth of coral fragments) is encouraged overseas to increase industry sustainability. Farming of corals from larvae or fragments, while ecologically feasible, is probably not financially viable in the current Australian market.

Download a complete copy of the report(Adobe PDF 83KB)