|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The objectives of this study were to measure the effects of line
fishing on the average size, age and sex ratio of coral trout, Plectropomus
leopardus in the central Great Barrier Reef (GBR). From 1990 to 1993
coral trout were collected by line fishing at two coral reefs, Glow and
Yankee, closed to fishing since 1987, and at two other reefs, Grub and
Hopkinson, that have always been open to fishing. There was no significant
difference in average size or age of coral trout on reefs closed and open
to fishing, despite the reefs having been closed for 6 years by 1993.
This may have resulted from illegal fishing on the closed reefs and/or
fishing pressure on the open reefs being low. There were significant differences
in average size and age of trout between the open reefs (Grub, Hopkinson)
and the closed reefs (Glow and Yankee), reflecting natural variability
in populations between reefs or variations in accessibility of open reefs,
with Grub being a much better anchorage than Hopkinson and thus being
more heavily fished.
On the two reefs closed to fishing, the population structure was
dominated by a strong cohort (year class) which settled onto the reefs
in early 1984 (i.e. 6, 7, 8, 9 years old in 1990, 1991, 1992 and 1993
respectively). The strong cohort accounted for 54%, 45%, 42% and 36% of
the experimental hook and line catches on reefs closed to fishing in 1990
to 1993 respectively. Note that maximum age for coral trout is around
fourteen years on Townsville reefs. This is the first time a dominant
age class has been tracked over time for any coral reef fish by examination
of age structures. The results demonstrate that strong interannual fluctuations
in recruitment can influence the abundance of coral trout populations
substantially, and that the effect of strong recruitment events can be
retained in the age structure of coral trout populations. On the closed
reefs an event that occurred in 1984 was still dominating the fishery
9 years later in 1993. This finding has important implications for the
management of the fishery and zoning (reef closure) strategy of the Great
Barrier Reef Marine Park. It suggests the possibility that abundance of
coral trout in the fishery may be predicted two to four years in advance
using yearly surveys of newly settled juveniles, in a similar way to the
use of settlement intensities of larval lobsters to predict catches of
western rock lobsters four years in advance. Furthermore GBRMPA may, in
future, be able to arrange timing and location of reef closures, based
on counts of newly settled juveniles, to best maintain regional populations
of trout.
A similar strong cohort was not observed on the fished reefs close
by, although there was a suggestion of such a cohort on Hopkinson
reef. If such a strong cohort did settle onto the open reefs fishing may
have reduced its abundance relative to other age classes in the population.
However, this would imply the unlikely scenario of the strong age class
somehow being more vulnerable to the line fishing gear than the other
age classes. The size structure of populations at all four reefs remained
relatively consistent, with no dominant size group in the population over
time at both closed and open reefs. Large variability in size at a given
age meant that age but not size structure provided a good indicator of
population dynamics.
By examining the stages of development of the gonads throughout the
year the annual spawning season was confirmed to be from early spring
to early summer off Townsville. Age at first reproduction was around two
to three years old (30 to 35cm, total length). Coral trout change sex
from female to male. Age and size at sex change was very variable. Sex
change was observed in coral trout from ages three to twelve years and
from lengths 30 to 55cm total length. Thus it was difficult to detect
a clear effect of fishing on the size and age at sex change. Since line
fishing tends to be selective for larger animals, fishing may affect the
sex ratio by reducing the proportion of males (which on average are larger
than females). The sex ratio varied among reefs and showed a slightly
higher proportion of males on the closed reefs. However, there were no
significant differences in size or age of males between reefs closed and
open to fishing. The main conclusion of this part of the work was that
closure to fishing did not have a strong effect on the sex structure of
coral trout off Townsville. Again, this may have resulted from illegal
fishing on closed reefs and/or fishing pressure on the open reefs being
low.
In summary, the effects of fishing on the average size, age and sex
ratio of coral trout were inconclusive. However, the presence of a
dominant year class in the population of trout on the two closed reefs
showed that strong interannual fluctuations in recruitment can influence
the abundance of coral trout populations substantially. This effect of
strong recruitment events can be retained in the age structure of coral
trout populations. On the closed reefs a recruitment event that occurred
in 1984 was still dominating the fishery nine years later in 1993. This
suggests the possibility that abundance of coral trout in the fishery
may be predicted two to four years in advance using yearly surveys of
newly settled juveniles.
THIS PUBLICATION IS CITED AS:
Russ, G.R., Lou, D.C. and Ferreira, B.P. (1995).
A long-term study on population structure of the coral trout Plectropomus
leopardus on reefs open and closed to fishing in the central Great Barrier
Reef, Australia.
CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd
Technical Report No. 3
Townsville; CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd, 30 pp.
ISBN 1 876054 02 6.
A full copy of this report may be obtained from the author(s),
and through the following libraries:
Agency libraries: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority,
Townsville; Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville; James
Cook University, Townsville; Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries
(Brisbane and regional offices); Queensland Department of Environment
and Heritage (Brisbane and regional offices); CSIRO Division of Marine
Research, Tasmania.
Public libraries: Queensland, New South Wales, Tasmania and South
Australia State libraries; National Library, ACT.
Parliamentary libraries: Queensland, New South Wales and South
Australia parliamentary libraries.
For a hard copy (or pdf file) of the report contact CRC Reef on info@crcreef.com.
|