|
P O'Neil, Queensland Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries
H Heatwole, Department of Zoology, North Carolina State Univeristy
M Preker, 321 Pullenvale Road, Pullenvale
M Jones, Department of Zoology, Univeristy of Tasmania
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Significant declines in the population size of the brown booby
(Sula leucogaster) have recently been reported from the Swain
Reefs (Heatwole et al. in review), as indicated through direct censuses
of the populations over a period of more than ten years. During the same
period of time, the population of the sympatric masked booby (Sula
dactylatra) did not vary greatly. This paper reports on an extensive
mark/recapture program of the same populations. The two species were banded
and recaptured in the area for more than ten years.
Strong breeding colony fidelity has been demonstrated for both
species in other parts of the world, leading to the suggestion that little
gene flow occurs between geographically separate populations. These suggestions
are supported by the present analysis of banding recoveries from the Swain
Reefs, and other locations on the Great Barrier Reef and in the Coral
Sea. In both these species, strong breeding colony fidelity appears to
occur within the regional populations scattered over this broad area,
but breeding site fidelity is weaker within the breeding populations of
the closely spaced meta-population in the Swain Reefs. This suggests that
some flexibility in management of human visitation is possible where closely
spaced meta-populations of these species occur, but that displacement
of a regional population may result in permanent loss, with little chance
of re-colonisation from other regional populations.
Most of the extra-limital recaptures of both species were young birds. Masked boobies banded in the Swain Reefs were mostly recaptured along
the Queensland coast, whereas brown boobies were mostly recaptured along
the coasts of Papua New Guinea and in the Solomon Islands. This may indicate
that only the young birds of these species disperse large distances, and
that there are substantial differences in the between-species dispersal
patterns. These differences may be relevant in explaining why a significant
population decline occurred in the brown booby and not in the sympatric
masked booby, but this requires further work.
THIS PUBLICATION IS CITED AS:
O'Neill, P., Heatwole, H., Preker, M., & Jones, M. (1996)
Populations, movements and site fidelity of brown and masked boobies
on the Swain Rreefs, Great Barrier Reef, as shown by banding recoveries.
CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd
Technical Report No. 11
Townsville; CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd, 36 pp.
ISBN 1 876054 10 7.
A full copy of this report may be obtained from the author(s),
and through the following libraries:
Agency libraries: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority,
Townsville; Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville; James
Cook University, Townsville; Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries
(Brisbane and regional offices); Queensland Department of Environment
and Heritage (Brisbane and regional offices); CSIRO Division of Marine
Research, Tasmania.
Public libraries: Queensland, New South Wales, Tasmania and South
Australia State libraries; National Library, ACT.
Parliamentary libraries: Queensland, New South Wales and South
Australia parliamentary libraries.
For a hard copy (or pdf file) of the report contact CRC Reef on info@crcreef.com.
|