|
||||||||||||||
|
April 1995 NewsletterEcologically Sustainable Development: AN OXYMORON?by Graeme Inglis A recent article by Ludwig in the prestigious journal Science argued that we should distrust claims of ecological sustainability on the basis that it offers no more to managers of natural resources than past ill-defined policy objectives, such as maximum sustainable yield, which failed to prevent the exhaustion of supposedly renewable resources. Central to the criticisms in that paper was the lack of any clear definition of what "sustainability" means in practice. As it is currently used in Australia, ESD incorporates amorphous dimensions of intergenerational equity, protection of ecological systems, economic progress and global obligations (see National ESD Strategy - Commonwealth Government of Australia 1992) which make it something of a moving target to those of us responsible for implementing it. (Is the concept itself sustainable?). As the CRC for the ESD of the GBR, the programs and activities done by this Centre are inextricably linked to the pursuit of ecologically sustainable development in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. An understanding of the diversity of views within the Centre on what this central concept means in practice is important for the development of common goals and objectives for the CRC's activities. In December 1994, CRC Reef News made a call for individuals and member organisations of the CRC to contribute items outlining their personal perspectives on ESD and its application to the Great Barrier Reef. This challenge has now been taken up by Claudia Ludescher, an Honours student within the Department of Tropical Environment Studies & Geography at James Cook University. Claudia's report 'Perceived meanings of 'ecologically sustainable development' within the CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd' is now available from the CRC secretariate. REFERENCE: |